1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Propositions to innova and NCSoft

Discussion in 'Archive' started by zeus04, Jun 5, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zeus04

    zeus04 User

    Joined:
    23.12.11
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    3
    to ncsoft as a game creator:
    - try to implement to game new drop option for a command channel (fk/random/random with spoil for cc), it will eliminate a lot of scamers. at last no scamers on istina/octavis ect. for randoms pt. also in new lilith/anakim doing mostly by boxes (=read char create only to scam drop).

    to innova:
    change rewards system from three head dragon egg. rewerds are good but dispell 1 day penalty from items. bsoe/bres for one day?
    cp/hp/mp potion 1 day? totally nonsens

    i'm not qq it's only a propositions.
     
  2. DeepBlue

    DeepBlue Head Moderator (EU) Head moderator

    Joined:
    30.11.11
    Messages:
    13,751
    Likes Received:
    435
    thank you for your feedback but things specifically directed to the developers belong here :)

    regards.
     
  3. oderon

    oderon User

    Joined:
    06.12.11
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    1
    there were no mentions anywhere but the rewards have changed in lindvior!
    i received today a 60 min heavenly coctail (1 day limit) and 10 warrior's quick cp pots (no limit) :p
     
  4. zeus04

    zeus04 User

    Joined:
    23.12.11
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    3
    thx i just meke my new post there :)

    thx oderon
    ok, so time will show us what are those new reward :) i got in my mind those 1 day limit it is very annoying especialy for players who don't play every day bot only 3-4 time a week.
     
  5. DeepBlue

    DeepBlue Head Moderator (EU) Head moderator

    Joined:
    30.11.11
    Messages:
    13,751
    Likes Received:
    435
    the new agathion rewards are announced here

    regards.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.