1. Этот сайт использует файлы cookie. Продолжая пользоваться данным сайтом, Вы соглашаетесь на использование нами Ваших файлов cookie. Узнать больше.

Experiment 120 Tank's block chance and CON

Тема в разделе "Latest Experiments", создана пользователем Tully, 11 мар 2015.

  1. Tully

    Tully Innova Group

    Регистрация:
    15.10.12
    Сообщения:
    179
    Симпатии:
    86
    when a knight is heavy-blown
    and his shield is close to shatter
    do his muscles really matter
    or they're nothing on their own?

    [​IMG]


    in this experiment we were testing the dependence of block chance of tank classes from their con.

    othell adventurer was chosen as attacker, sigel phoenix knight was the defender. he was attacked both from the front and the back side with reverse (lvl 4). after each series of experiments con was increased. each conducted experiment involved 500 hits with reverse. experiments count only misses and 1 damage blocks, since with such powerful buffs sigel knight is able to block every single attack.

    sigel phoenix knight’s buffs and equipment:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    the results are the following:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    conclusion. as we can see, con does not affect the probability of successful shield block significantly. adding 45 points to con didn’t increase the successful block probability even by 3%. the probability increase is not significant while attacking both from the front and the back sides.
     
    Stanicheff и Norekien нравится это.
  2. Seivlas

    Seivlas User

    Регистрация:
    27.05.14
    Сообщения:
    997
    Симпатии:
    211
    2 times more is great. it's always frustrating as a yul when you land a bullseye after the knight cubic to see your pinpoint hit for 1 :s
     
  3. kTaRn

    kTaRn User

    Регистрация:
    27.02.15
    Сообщения:
    53
    Симпатии:
    1
    very interesting, that put an end to the *must have* 90 con myth.
     
  4. Bers Ser

    Bers Ser User

    Регистрация:
    28.02.14
    Сообщения:
    188
    Симпатии:
    14
    Please can you update the image?