1. Этот сайт использует файлы cookie. Продолжая пользоваться данным сайтом, Вы соглашаетесь на использование нами Ваших файлов cookie. Узнать больше.
Скрыть объявление
Здравствуй, Гость.
Мы подготовили тему с комментариями и объяснениями к Правилам форума.
В ней описаны многие спорные моменты, список запрещенных сокращений и т.п.
Ознакомиться с данной темой можно перейдя по ссылке.

Melee parties > PP vs. SE

Тема в разделе "Archive", создана пользователем Alexsaysz, 3 май 2015.

Статус темы:
Закрыта.
  1. Alexsaysz

    Alexsaysz User

    Регистрация:
    26.04.15
    Сообщения:
    570
    Симпатии:
    142
    considering the buffs/heals that both have (and se recharge), and the comeback of stigma with 2.0 (the comeback of mystic immunity in 2.0 doesnt affect pve too much imo), what would be more pve efficient for:


    -small melee parties

    -full melee parties


    i haven't had the chance to play on ru/kr classics so i dont know what class would be more efficient on this old-like chonicle.
     
  2. lHuggyBear

    lHuggyBear User

    Регистрация:
    22.04.15
    Сообщения:
    11
    Симпатии:
    1
    in my opinion pp is better for melee/archer pt than se
     
  3. Luminight

    Luminight User

    Регистрация:
    13.10.14
    Сообщения:
    378
    Симпатии:
    119
    imo pp is better
     
    PanPan нравится это.
  4. sharx

    sharx User

    Регистрация:
    30.04.15
    Сообщения:
    55
    Симпатии:
    9
    im having doubts aswell, it will depend if your melee are mana hungry i guess.
     
  5. Advocad

    Advocad User

    Регистрация:
    27.12.11
    Сообщения:
    157
    Симпатии:
    63
    uhm.. usually with the pp you will run out of mana before you buff the entire party.

    for melee, consider wc. this way you will be a factor in pvp too
     
  6. sharx

    sharx User

    Регистрация:
    30.04.15
    Сообщения:
    55
    Симпатии:
    9
    were going pp vs se. this has nothing todo with an wc ... lol please stick to the topic or create another one
     
    scentwander, luthercezart, kornel32 и ещё 1-му нравится это.
  7. Swayarn

    Swayarn User

    Регистрация:
    27.04.15
    Сообщения:
    109
    Симпатии:
    28
    pp = buffs
    se = healer/manabattery/empower
     
  8. Machinae

    Machinae User

    Регистрация:
    07.03.15
    Сообщения:
    71
    Симпатии:
    30
    i would go se personally, if you go se you'll probably be partied with a pp/wc as the primary buffer and you'll buff your unique along with taking charge of healing and recharge, perhaps rooting depending on the pt. you then have the option if there is no melee pt to be snapped up into a mage party. all you'll really do as a pp is buff and regen mana ready to buff again, that's why i'd personally go se because that would bore me to death.
     
    Kakarott нравится это.
  9. Swayarn

    Swayarn User

    Регистрация:
    27.04.15
    Сообщения:
    109
    Симпатии:
    28
    coudln't agree with you more!
    the prophet is a 1buttom clicker, make a macro bind the buffs you need for a meele pt and then be sitting and regen for 10min! and the party itself most likley rather get a wc.
    as a se you can recharge and heal, alot more parties will open up for you, and also, if you wanna play meele's you have vampiric rage, and for caster pt's you'll end up with empower+recharge!
     
    HellsinG нравится это.
  10. escalibran

    escalibran User

    Регистрация:
    04.12.11
    Сообщения:
    297
    Симпатии:
    23
    warcryer has nothing at start of l2, make one later when it gets good buffs.

    get pp + se. and maybe a bishop too. one to buff, one to heal, one to recharge. you have 2 more slots in party in classic, but you also need more supports to work well when you get higher levels.


    replace the pp with wc when it becomes relevant. keep the pp character on a seperate account, you will need it for elemental buffs in later chronicle. (but for nothing else. yay, useful class)
     
  11. wtfred

    wtfred User

    Регистрация:
    12.03.15
    Сообщения:
    44
    Симпатии:
    9
    man please stop, classic is not prelude
     
  12. fagercraft

    fagercraft User

    Регистрация:
    12.12.11
    Сообщения:
    442
    Симпатии:
    138
    warcryer 7-40 is really fricking powerful, awesome solo, aesome duo, awesome aoe party.
    40+ he loses his aoe abit, but starts to gain as a buffer. freezing flame is awesome and has good sleep and all pve buffs except for high lvl focus (but lvl1 is the most important one). gets ww also in age of war, and single target heal!

    however, since max lvl here is really 60-62, he doesnt get high level of all buffs (guid, focus especially) but those are easly covered from ses.

    i think the best advantage of pp is that there is no noble buff, if someone dies a wc needs full mp to buff, pp can much easier rebuff died members (pve and pvp)
    also theres is no cov (we all no cov was the **** early, and topnoth later on while pof went from decent to bad basically)
     
Статус темы:
Закрыта.