1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

WTS +7 Req Stormer (bound now), anyone need some bling? :)

Discussion in 'Archive' started by escalibran, Jan 13, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. escalibran

    escalibran User

    Joined:
    04.12.11
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    21
    wts +8 req stormer, anyone need some bling? :)

    hi

    i only made it because i wanted to convert my mentee coins into money, but the enchants didnt fail.

    at this time, less than 25 +8 r weapons were made
    http://i.imgur.com/tpe5j.jpg
    and a good deal of those probably exploded going for higher enchants or were lost to inactivity.

    i realize this is not a *strong* item. it has a little more patk than +3 apo stormer, and the +4 bonus (hit more targets). and it's bound at the moment, too.
    however, now that it's so high i thought somebody may want to have it for bling on their dualclass or maybe just to try and +9 it.

    crystallization is worth 6537 r crystals. 7099 after its unbound.
    asking price: 12k crystals / 150m + unbind r to be able to trade it.

    i will wait for offers, then it's going +9 or crystals.

    bye!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 17, 2013
  2. escalibran

    escalibran User

    Joined:
    04.12.11
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    21
    10characters
     
  3. escalibran

    escalibran User

    Joined:
    04.12.11
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    21
  4. escalibran

    escalibran User

    Joined:
    04.12.11
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    21
    close pls, done.
     
  5. Finch

    Finch User

    Joined:
    12.12.11
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    10
    sold or broken? :d
     
  6. escalibran

    escalibran User

    Joined:
    04.12.11
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    21
    broken :)
    no more history for me, but i guess 11th place will last a while hehe.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.